Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist
I find this to be a really interesting case and I'm trying to remain objective when watching the case unfold. The Crown and police have done an excellent job of putting together the crime that was committed but actually matching that crime to Garland requires a bit of speculation. It is unlikely that someone else killed the victims but at the same time there doesn't seem to be enough evidence to implicate Garland. I wonder how long the jury will take to come to a decision or if it will become a hung juror situation.
|
I didn't hear all the evidence, but it seems to be a very strong circumstantial case. Stronger than OJ.