Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike F
LOL.
If you'll go back through this thread, you'll see I never said that his choice not to address the team was a bad thing. I don't really care, and am not about to say it's bad just out of blind hatred.
My only emotion in this whole debate is amusement/incredulity that a guy would spend just one season with another coach, see that coach make an enormous mess out of that season both on the ice and off, leading to that other coach being fired after that one season, and decide to change a lifelong pattern to be more like him.
The fact that posters want to strongly defend Gulutzen from even that mild a criticism also has me bemused given, as I've said before, Gulutzen has no track record of any real success as an NHL coach.
|
There's your bias shining through.
The only thing going on here is that most people are saying that, regardless of what you think of Gulutzan, this isn't a reason to criticize him.
But you're trying to spin it as a stupid thing to learn something from Torts, just because the Nucks sucked the year they worked together.
It's a non story.
Stating that it is a non story, does not make a person a Gulutzan apologist.