Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion
You're missing the point. He was given a discharge because the board believes he will continue to take his medication.
This time around there won't be anyone required to make sure he takes them. Too much trust given IMO.
|
No, I get the point. He is unconditionally released. I may not agree with the ruling, but my support is not required.
Baker can choose to continue to be monitored. He can choose to take his meds. Can choose to keep appointments with his therapist.
Or can choose to do none of those things - without repercussion.