Quote:
Originally Posted by DionTheDman
It's not my "fall back position", it is the position of the legal system in Canada, the medical system in Canada, the latter of which includes doctors who have worked directly with him for years and years, who know his case best, and who are in the best position to gauge whether he is capable of functioning as a member of society.
|
As I said (and you just ignored), there are many example of people in positions of trust making egregious, regrettable decisions. So when you say (and I quote):
Quote:
|
If they deem him safe to be released, he's safe to be released. If they deem him a minuscule risk to offend, then he's a minuscule risk to offend. And Rational Me is ok with that, and accepts that.
|
that couldn't be more naive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DionTheDman
I find YOUR blind fear in him utterly and completely unjustifiable and ignorant, and so yeah, if you want to continue to revel in your ignorance, then sure, we're done discussing this.
|
lol, I say I think he should be monitored for life and that I wouldn't want him to live (unsupervised) near me or my family.
I ask you if you'd want him living next to yours and you say "no". And I'm "revealing in ignorance" for those two very simple opinions?
You two need to get over yourselves and come to terms to the fact there's a good reason people are uncomfortable with this decision that couldn't be more rational.