Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood
|
Yes and while not conclusive evidence, its another one of the circumstantial piences and it suggests he knew he needed to run because he did something.
Let's say the defence put on evidence he ran because he did something else, let's say, had some pot plants on the acreage, and that gave him a reason to run.
In this case, they aren't going to put him on the stand to explain the running.
Admirable job by the police on this case, and the prosecution. I'm a little wondering the defence here, I know they're at the top of their game but I expected more pushback.