Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
I just did... unless you're saying their purpose was specifically to not allow him to speak to a small audience in person on that single evening, which would be pretty shortsighted given that he can now speak to a much larger audience via the Internet. And will probably just go back, considering it's guaranteed now to draw more media attention to him if he tries.
Seriously, you'd have to be an idiot to call this a win of any kind.
|
You honestly think the university will allow him back there again? Their goal was to prevent him from speaking there. Shortsighted or not, they accomplished that.
EDIT: I mean if you want to contrast it to the women's march, what exactly was accomplished there? The goal was to protest the incoming threat of legislation that was damaging to women's rights and their health, all of which and more has since been passed, more of which will be passed in the next 4-8 years. It was a great display of civic engagement but it had zero effect on the final outcome. Or am I just being cynical?