View Single Post
Old 02-07-2017, 01:02 PM   #327
Hockeyguy15
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckedoff View Post
Is there a point in the trial where the jury can decide they have seen enough, and issue their verdict?
I can't see that being allowed, it would totally undermine the whole point of a trial. They have to sit through what the Crown presents and what the defence presents, if they just sat through part of it they could potentially miss out on something that would change their mind.
Hockeyguy15 is offline   Reply With Quote