Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042
The difference being is that unmedicated, he did commit a very violent act. He is now medicated, and his freedom should be based upon him remaining medicated. The only way to do that is to check in on him.
|
Do you have evidence to support your belief that he will stop taking medication once he is stopped being monitored?
Do you believe the experts have not thought of the possibility of him stopping to take his medicine?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ken0042
If he had been, he would have been left in jail and likely never been given parole.
|
Yes. If you changed the circumstances the consequences also change. Not really sure the point of that is. If you murdered someone, you would be in jail..but you didn't, so who cares?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ken0042
In my mind, part of not being criminally responsible due to mental disease is that you disease must be monitored.
|
Maybe in your mind, certainly not by the Criminal Code of Canada that was upheld by the Supreme Court.