Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
I would argue any burden is excessive to an innocent person who is not a threat to society. And I have the Supreme Court backing me up on that.
I obviously take personal freedoms very seriously, but I can safely say I would rather live in a society that occasionally gets it wrong and gives people who shouldn't have them complete personal freedoms, than a society that will remove personal freedoms to an innocent person.
|
I agree medicated Li, isn't a threat to society.
I would appear that non-medicated Li, is a threat (or potential threat) to society.
I can accept medicated Li walking around living his life. I struggle with non-medicated Li doing the same.
If he is remorseful (which I believe he is) is would seem to follow that he would be willing to have a procedure/process in place to ensure the non-medicated Li doesn't get out again.
In short, if I was in his place (I hope I never am) I would think that I would agree to a process to ensure I was always medicated so I could enjoy my life, free of concerns that I might have another episode resulting in a similar event.