Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
No, I'm suggesting that because he was found not criminally responsible he was deemed not criminally responsible.
Which has what to do with the death penalty exactly?
Like what's your argument here. Someone posts that a person like this, who experts (you know the guys with education and experience dealing with this) have evaluated as a low threat to re-offend, actually has a low threat to re-offend. And your post was "THAT'S LIKE DEATH PENALTY" what?
How is giving an innocent man, who is not a threat to society according to experts, the possibility a chance of a normal life (or at least the most normal you could have for a person in his situation), like the death penalty? It's almost like those are complete polar opposites.
|
I suppose my comparison to the "near zero" portion of things was completely missed/ignored by you. If you cant understand that, I guess we shouldnt bother proceeding further.