Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang
I dont know how many ways or how many times I can say it before you will stop trying to argue something that isnt there...
Im not saying Larsson is better than Brodie. Not once.
Is Brodie more offensively gifted than Larsson? Absolutely.
Is Larsson more defensively gifted than Brodie? Absolutely.
Lets leave it at that.
The cost that was to acquire Hamilton who wanted out of Boston and the cost for NJ to acquire Hall who fell out of favor in Edm cant really be compared can they? Two completely different situations.
In saying that, the only constant is Chia..
So when saying that Hall/Larsson are comparable to what Sakic would get for Landeskog is completely ludicrous.
So lets say Landeskog>Hall and Brodie >Larsson... so that means Brodie should get you Landeskog? No..
Again, I have been saying it since the very start... these situations have nothing to do with each other and the Hall trade is certainly not the precedent.
So for someone to surmise that Brodie gets you Landeskog its such a complete fallacy.
And this is what you have been doing.
|
Geez man you are just off
Why doesn't a Dman like Brodie (signed to an amazing contract, scored 40+pts, played against top matchups) not get you Landeskog (signed to a reasonable deal, injury history, ~50pts). I think the mistake I have made arguing with you was not you under-rating Brodie but you over-rating Landeskog. Again laughable that you absolutely say Larson is better defensively than Brodie. Do you forget that Gio-Brodie were an amazing defensive pairing the past 2 years.