Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Um, no. No, no, no.
Seriously, as I just said, that article is terrifying. However, it is merely plausible (which is what's terrifying) and not by any means a certain description of events. It reads like a conspiracy theory with the caveat that it's not totally crazy to suggest the conspiracy might be happening.
That being said, reactions like your post are totally counterproductive. If you can't keep a level head, if that guy's writing frightens you to the point that anyone who's so much as playing devil's advocate on any issue becomes the enemy, you might be better off not reading it at all.
tl;dr: calm the #### down.
|
I think this commentary from you is really unfair. The basis for it clearly stems from poor reading of the post on your part.
The irony of course is that in this instance it is you who has been unable to keep a level head, appearing to let previous contentious arguments with Pepsi influence your reading comprehension of his post.
As someone that holds themselves on this board as an arbiter of reason and truth I think it behooves you to re-examine your reaction to this string of posts and to potentially rectify your statements which are quite obviously a result of a less than thorough attempt to understand his position in favour of a reactive response.
We all get lathered up from time to time, I know I do, but I feel as though you are clearly projecting internalised feelings/perspectives from previously heated discussions that we have witnessed in previous months between you two.