Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
Do you know why most people consider Belichick to be a greater coach than Brady a greater QB? Matt Cassel. Namely, Belichick went 11-5 in an entire season without Brady (and actually missed the playoffs). Then he went 3-1 again this year without Brady. You'll point out the year Aaron got hurt and they snuck in, but come on. That was because the NFC North was a disgrace and every team choked, not because of a genius McCarthy coaching job.
Essentially I think McCarthy can be replaced by virtually any coach for the last 10 years, and the Packers would still have at least 1 Super Bowl out of it. Aaron Rodgers is basically like Peyton Manning was, the real coach of the team. Remember when Jim Caldwell won his first 14 games as coach? Was he a great coach for doing that? Or he did have Peyton? Then of course as soon as Peyton got hurt, he went 2-14. I suspect if Rodgers suffered a season ender before the start of next year, the Packers would probably win less than 4 games. It's nothing personal against McCarthy, but he doesn't do anything to give the Packers the coaching advantage. Aaron Rodgers is the entire Green Bay Packers advatnage over other teams. Certainly not their run game, or defense. Just be goddamn thankful you're going to 30 years without ever having to worry that you don't have a legend at QB. Browns fans (to start) ####ing hate you lol.
|
So in conclusion, because Aaron Rodgers has never had a season ending injury before the year starts, and Tom Brady has and Belichik went 11-5 as the coach of the Patriots that very season...
Mike McCarthy is an average coach at best who "can be replaced by virtually any coach"?
That's weird.