View Single Post
Old 01-11-2017, 06:05 PM   #18
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
Sure, but if these things are applied in a manner that frustrates the purpose of the NEB Act, they're read down so as not to apply to the interprovincial undertaking owing to federal paramountcy.

For example, if the NEB grants a permit to build the pipeline in a particular location, and the Municipality of Burnaby refuses to grant them the requisite permits to build the facilities they need, it doesn't matter if Burnaby has the jurisdiction to grant or withhold such permits in general.

Anyway I haven't thought about this very hard, which is why I asked the question, so these are more musings and intuitive reactions than anything.
Yeah, and if they aren't then they are totally constitutional.

That was kind of my point when I replied to your question.

Could the conditions be unconstitutional? Sure.
Is there any reason to assume they wouldn't be (which is kind of what your question assumed)? Nope.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote