Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Probably, but wouldn't both sides of that equation likely have similar sorts of difficult-to-estimate impacts like these?
|
Is it? I don't see the big stretch or leap of faith required to assert that more productive and healthy people is better for society as a whole than less. Obviously that's simplifying it substantially but that's pretty much what it boils down to if you're strictly looking at it pragmatically, without even getting into the morality at play when societies of plenty refuse to care for their own.