Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
It is true that our opinions differ, but I posit that yours is poorly informed. Mine is summarised in this discussion by the following comments:
|
Really? Because your post is well summarized to me with this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
I completely disagree. Yes, Johnson's run was very important to the Flames run up the standings, but it is really impossible to say how much better or worse the team would have been with someone else in his place. The Flames would be worse off without Johnson, but still much better off than the Western Conference bottom feeders.
|
Which, is a opinion that I strongly disagree with. It's pretty easy to claim re-written history would favour your opinion, but looking back at the state of the team before his run absolutely shows the contrary. Things were looking bad for the Flames, and the outlook was grim. It was on Johnson's back that this season was saved and I'm very confident in that.