Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
One reason would be consistency. I don't know what the details are in this case, but in general one would want the least amount of disturbance for the kids IMO (assuming one of the parents wasn't negligent or dangerous).
Wherever they have their friends, have their school, etc is where the kids should be and the parent(s) should move to suit those goals.
Again not sure what that means for this specific situation just in general.
|
Hard to say since it says they lived in both Canada and Australia.
There are a lot of details that aren't going to be said public, so if people are really thinking about donating they should probably PM any questions.