Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
I'm going to be a bit of a dick as well here but I see no more reason that they should live in Canada
|
One reason would be consistency. I don't know what the details are in this case, but in general one would want the least amount of disturbance for the kids IMO (assuming one of the parents wasn't negligent or dangerous).
Wherever they have their friends, have their school, etc is where the kids should be and the parent(s) should move to suit those goals.
Again not sure what that means for this specific situation just in general.