View Single Post
Old 01-03-2017, 01:12 PM   #87
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post

The whole idea that just because we aren't safe all the time means we can't add safety measures to certain actions some of the time makes no sense.
The 'whole idea' is that our notions of Safe and Unsafe are binary, and largely unsupported by empirical data. The safety of children is regarded as a kind of sacred value, so people don't want to recognize that it's situational, and subject to a sliding scale of risk and convenience. Putting kids in helmets for car rides would unquestionably make them safer. The only reason not to is convenience and comfort. There is no clear, hard line between putting kids in helmets when tobogganing and putting them in helmets for trips in the car. Most people don't want to think too much about this stuff, so they rely on social norms to guide their behaviour. But social norms are a terrible guide to risk assessment (see nobody lets their kids play outside anymore because of stranger danger).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.

Last edited by CliffFletcher; 01-03-2017 at 01:15 PM.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post: