[Lanny_MacDonald]

Originally Posted by JohnnyFlame

Next, "the BBC, much like the CBC, for not representing the views of the majority" is also ludicrous. They are a news agency. They are not supposed to represent the views of the majority, they are to report the news and inform the people.

YOU are incredibly naive if you think the CBC reports news in an unbiased manner. In fact if you watch news programs(any of them) or read newspapers and don't see how they have their own agenda you are not much of a intellect.

Did I say there was not a bias? No I did not. What I did say was that they are NOT supposed to be representative of the views of the majority. I also have said that certain institutions still follow given practices which make them less biased than others, which is very true. The established media does follow practices that others do not.

Your argument is atypical of those on this board. You attack the poster repeatedly acting like you are some part of the intelligensia -- Funny how after many years of reading your stuff I've never noticed you were any smarter than JOE DUFUS off the street.

Sure Johnny, no proof is ever posted. I just sit back and toss the feces with the rest of the monkeys. You have to appeal to the lowest common denominator and get into the trenches to fight the battles. Kind of like when anyone talks to you they have to sound like a demented old codger so you'll sort of get the jest of what is going on. You know Johnny, in all the years I've read you inane "fart" fill ramblimgs, I've always noticed you to be much less intelligent than JOE DUFUS on the street, and this post is just more proof of that.

You describe FoxNews of attacking the messenger and not the message but fart that's your MO in these arguments to a tee.

Uh huh. Some of these topics have been beaten to death, and are considered common knowledge by my standard. I could bury HOZ in a sea of links that would prove him completely wrong, but we've been there before. The guy just keeps on dredging up the same stuff and trying to spin it, a la FauxNews.

The news media hasn't reported the news without a bias in ages --- Wakeup already. They have long since either gone with an agenda that pleases those that tune into their broadcast or gone with the standard overblow anything to create news.

Wow, thanks for clearing that up. In other stunning news, Lance Bass is gay.

An intelligent person would take what they hear/read with a grain of salt no matter where they hear and read it. An intelligent rationally thinking person would look at the current state of politics with an extremetly skeptical view of all parties/politicians.

You want something you can back up with facts. That politics is increasing bankrupt is something you could backup with facts that would take you generations to type. Example after example after example involving politicians of all stripes.

Go Johnny, go!!! Fart! I love the statements of the obvious!!! You're on a roll!!!

As long as I read/hear one side painting the other as Hitler or some other such unbelievably stupid ignorant way over the top lame brained rubbish then that the whole thing is about BS and not actual policy is beyond refute.

And we should take your advice with a grain of salt (the size of the Great Salt Lake bed perchance)? Did you not read your own nutbar rambling post about the Larry King Show. My advice, seek some help. Others saw the exact same show and came away with a completely different interpretation. Some how you heard "Spring time for Hitler" and equated that with a comparison of Bush to Hitler and that set you off. Wow. Pot, meet kettle.