Next, "the BBC, much like the CBC, for not representing the views of the majority" is also ludicrous. They are a news agency. They are not supposed to represent the views of the majority, they are to report the news and inform the people.
YOU are incredibly naive if you think the CBC reports news in an unbiased manner. In fact if you watch news programs(any of them) or read newspapers and don't see how they have their own agenda you are not much of a intellect.
Your argument is atypical of those on this board. You attack the poster repeatedly acting like you are some part of the intelligensia -- Funny how after many years of reading your stuff I've never noticed you were any smarter than JOE DUFUS off the street.
You describe FoxNews of attacking the messenger and not the message but fart that's your MO in these arguments to a tee.
The news media hasn't reported the news without a bias in ages --- Wakeup already. They have long since either gone with an agenda that pleases those that tune into their broadcast or gone with the standard overblow anything to create news.
An intelligent person would take what they hear/read with a grain of salt no matter where they hear and read it. An intelligent rationally thinking person would look at the current state of politics with an extremetly skeptical view of all parties/politicians.
You want something you can back up with facts. That politics is increasing bankrupt is something you could backup with facts that would take you generations to type. Example after example after example involving politicians of all stripes.
As long as I read/hear one side painting the other as Hitler or some other such unbelievably stupid ignorant way over the top lame brained rubbish then that the whole thing is about BS and not actual policy is beyond refute.
|