View Single Post
Old 12-23-2016, 12:30 PM   #56
IamNotKenKing
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis View Post
Well $450 million is also not true either, they will recoup the ticket tax amount. The amount of straight cash homey that the Flames are putting into a $1.3 billion project is $200 million, meaning someone else is picking up $1.1 billion of the tab. Gifted sounds closer to being right than being wrong.
The ticket tax is out of the owners' pockets, based upon market prices.

If I can get $100.00 for a ticket, and that is all the market will bear, and I don't have to put any of it to the building, I get $100.00.
If I have to put $10.00 of that price to the ticket tax for the building, then only $90.00 goes to my pocket.

I know some disagree, but that, in my opinion, means it is out of the owners' pockets. If it is tacked on top of the ticket price so that it is $110.00, then the market could bear that $110.00, which is still $10.00 out of my pocket, as owner.

And, the reason it is called a ticket tax as opposed to a surcharge or not mentioned at all is for Hockey Related Revenue arguments.

Edit: PS: Are you calling me homey? ; )

Last edited by IamNotKenKing; 12-23-2016 at 12:38 PM.
IamNotKenKing is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to IamNotKenKing For This Useful Post: