View Single Post
Old 12-23-2016, 01:23 PM   #698
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiracSpike View Post
Are ou still considered a CC "denier" if you're skeptical that scientists can predict with any kind of accuracy the conditions on earth with 1 or 2 degrees of warming and when that will occur? Or do you have to accept wholesale that it's coming, all our fault, and will kill us all?
Your or doesn't separate two sides of the same thing so the question doesn't make sense. Being able to predict outcomes isn't the other side of an OR of either accepting that it's coming or that it's caused by humans, and no one says it'll kill us all.

Being a denier means denying that AGW is a reality, the other side of the OR is accepting that AGW is a reality. Disagreeing on details of effects or if it's 78% or 75% due to human activities isn't denying the reality, it's working out the details of the reality.

EDIT: GL said it perfectly, "All models are wrong, it's just that some are useful."
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote