Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
Did Reuters and AP even cover that story?
I'm kind of surprised you think this inconsequential little article is worth posting here. These kinds of things are written all the time in the newspaper. It's certainly nothing like an overarching admission of bias or serious flaws, as your title implies.
|
Well first off AP and Reuters coverage of the Middle East is as bad or worse than BBC do to their Fauxtagraphy and imbedded terrorist photographers. Simply put their editorialising has been incompetant in the very least. Both have and are facing criticism for this.
Both BBC and the NYT have had severe criticism of their reporting from various sources over the past few years. BBC of course within Britain and NYT in the USA.
NYT especially for their banking surveilance scoop which was criticised widely from both Democrats and Republicans for screwing a legal covert operation to stop terrorists from their lifeline...money. NYT has been quietly backtracking for months.