Quote:
Originally posted by FlamesAddiction+Nov 4 2004, 03:43 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (FlamesAddiction @ Nov 4 2004, 03:43 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by calf@Nov 4 2004, 09:36 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-BlackArcher101
|
Quote:
@Nov 4 2004, 03:32 PM
Don't know why people thought it was CNN when it was even on netscapes website...# that's like seeing something on msn.ca and calling it CNN.
|
probably CNN covering its ass
...but when it's cnn.netscapecnn.com or whatever, there's definately going to be some that think CNN was/could have been involved
|
The address to the photo went outside of cnn.netscape to a different address. It still had "netscape" in it, but it wasn't CNN any more. [/b][/quote]
right, but there still could have been confusion by some associating the netscape site to CNN, and associating the photo to cnn