To me your whole point and view of history seems weird and off, to the point that it would probably take way too much effort (relative to potential benefits) to turn our different views into an informative debate. I mean it seems we'd have to get into really huge topics, like differences in how we see the general history of nations, history of Middle East and general history of nomads
)
So you know. Agree to disagree I guess, I'm satisfied with having my disagreement on the record here
