Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I think there was a time when Iginla and Regher just had different philospohies about what winning hockey looked like. IIRC Phaneuf was part of the debate.
It wasn't on the level of being enemies or anything.
|
I would say that's obvious. To a man with a hammer, everything is a nail. Regher couldn't score a goal or jump into the play if his life depended on it. The guy could only defend, so obviously he was happy when Keenan left and wanted more defense from guys. Obviously his philosophy was purely defense.
Anyways, as one person pointed out, that's not even evidence of a feud between Regher and Iginla. There is no evidence.
All of this can be explained by a fanatics desire to watch victories and their defense mechanisms force them to attack what they believe is the cause of their unhappiness, even if that belief was created by them and not an actual reflection of reality.