Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavvy
Fair enough, I wasn't thinking the same as I typed.
I still think your point of Calgary Deserving something is over the top.
|
Based on what?
I mayor bought land that can't possibly be developed because of prohibitive costs and me suggesting Calgarians deserve something for that investment is over the top?
Not in my books.
If they don't need an anchor tenant and the math doesn't work then do something else.
If an anchor tenant will help, and the mayor is serious about an Olympic games that will require new buildings (could end up costing the city 100% of the bill for them) then maybe he's making a big mistake.
Notice I'm not backing the CalgaryNext plan in any way ... just drop the crap and talk about it and come to a conclusion without all the BS and posturing.