Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
Well, "libel" is only when it isn't actually true. As far as I know, all indications are that these folks in all likelihood WERE involved in the Valerie Plame incident. At least Rove was, and either Bush and Cheney were involved, or they're idiots for not being able to figure it out.
Just because "Scooter" Libby agreed to take the fall for this doesn't mean he acted alone.
|
For once I am glad someone quoted White Doors. This would have slipped by otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
White Doors 
True, but I don't see Fox news as blindly ideological.
Has the NYT apologized for implicating Bush, Cheney et al. in the CIA agent exposure scandal?
Not sure if they did, but they certainly should.
When I read that quote in your post I almost choked on my lunch. Fox is not blindly ideological? If they are not, I don't know what is. Owned by a neo-conservative, managed by a neo-conservative who tells his employees what is news, and manned by neo-conservatives who repeat nothing but neo-conservative talking points. When Bill O'Reilly is a moderate on your network, you're nothing but blindly ideological. And station that gives major air time to Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, William Kristol and Brit Hume is ideological. They are so neo-conservative that when the White House went looking for a new mouthpiece to speak for thre administration that they hired Tony Snow away from Fox. Yup, not ideologues working for Fox. And this moron wonders why people consider him a troll? There is NOTHING he says that has any credability.