Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
Yeah, but is this the only law that siezes property that really doesn't have anything to do with the offense?
|
This law does have to do with the offense. If the john is driving around looking for prostitutes, the driving part is relevant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
Let's say a guy is out cruising for hookers. He's pestering the local women, bothering school children, and generally being a nuisance. He happens to be on foot though. Should the cops confiscate his shoes? It's pretty much the same idea. Whaddya think?
|
Sounds good! Let's do that next.
OR... we could use the famous 80/20 rule - cover 80% of the cases by using only 20% of effort (one law covers the majority of hooker cruising cases).
I highly doubt that the intent here is to cover off all cases... but deal with most of them. If you want to object because it isn't all-encompasing and only deals with "most" cases and not "all" cases, then go for it... but I'd rather have something than nothing.