Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
No one is trying to take away free speech or expression, unless we are talking about many colleges and universities.
|
Proof please. The opposite is true. If anyone is trying to curtail free speech on campuses it is the likes of David Horowoitz and College Republicans. His
Academic Bill of Rights is just the opposite, and his publication of
The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America is clearly aimed at silencing discussion, not fostering it. Since when is challenging your students to look at all sides of an issue a dangerous thing?
Quote:
|
But instead Trump was relentlessly attacked Hillary was treated like a saint in comparison.
|
Relentlessly attacked? Yes, because Trump had to go through so many congressional hearings and investigations spearheaded by the Republicans with no purpose other than to smear him! Poor Donald. Clinton had it so easy! I mean, the number of times she was caught lying in her stump speeches and the number of times she melted down on Twitter, it is amazing she wasn't forced to drop out. Not to mention that tape where she admitted to grabbing guys by their dicks and forcing them into kissing her. And then when she refused to release her tax returns? Man, she really got off easy.
Quote:
|
Hillary was THE chosen candidate, there was no way she could lose. This permeated nearly every form of media sans a few voices in the wilderness.
|
And when you say the wilderness you're talking about these types?
Quote:
|
Also, somehow it has been forgotten that the job of the media is to report the news not shape it.
|
Ewwwww, something I agree with you about!
Quote:
|
And if you believe entertainment should be a form of news and a way to inform people, then they should not be blatantly advocating.
|
Too bad the Supreme Court said just that. You can blame the state of our media on those clowns, and Ronald Reagan.