Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
That part is a big for me. They made an agreement in the partnership that the league would extensively pursue creative ways to increase hockey revenue, yet they prevent relocation of teams that are not bringing in revenue. It's not a 50/50 split when one side still has all the decision making power and are still only serving their own personal interests.
|
I'm just curious what percentage of the revenue you think the players should get since you seem to think 50/50 isn't fair?
I also don't see why the players should be making business decisions as they are very unqualified for that task. If they provided half of the money to run the league out of their own pockets I think you'd have a point.