Quote:
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
Well...the guy just reviewed the book. Does that mean he just read it and decided if he agreed with it or not? Or did he actual research all the data the author used to make his book. I am assuming a lot of what is in the book, is speculation. Exactly what conspiracies are made of. Is this the case?
|
You might do your self a favor and read the review. It was pretty supportive and the guy stated what his background was (intelligence community) and that he thought it was well researched and supported. Ironically, this guy isn't the only member of the intelligence community that thinks its an inside job and that there is enough evidence hanging out there to support an independent study. But hey, you would know better on the feeling there, wouldn't you?
Quote:
|
I follow the theory of Ockham's razor in most cases...
|
And yet you believe the "official" story? Wow, what a contradiction. I seriously doubt you have read the official story and only believe what has been passed into the echo chamber as "fact". There are so many holes in the official story that Ockham's Razor would slice it to ribbons.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
I don't believe that the USA government was involved and I probably never will....unless....REAL TANGIBLE evidence is available.
|
Yet you believe that bin Laden and al Qaeda were involved and there is NO REAL TANGIBLE evidence available to link them to the events other than the intelligence turned over by other nations. Interesting double standard.