View Single Post
Old 11-24-2016, 05:08 PM   #233
Stealth22
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by worth View Post
I agree with you guys. The only saving grace that would force the government to make a decision is 18 fighters does not make a fleet. I'm sure these suepr hornets will be in service a long time, why wouldn't they be? But 18 planes once the CF-18's are retires are not going to cover our responsibilities NATO and NORAD responsibilities, so they will have to commit buy more planes at some point in time.
I suppose you're right.

But still...five years! There's no reason to take that long, aside from it being conveniently past this government's expiration date.

It basically guarantees that we won't have a new fighter (whatever it ends up being) in service until 2050. We'll limp along with our 18 Super Hornets, and whatever is left of the old CF-18's, until they start falling out of the sky.

This so-called "capability gap" is only going to get bigger if you only have a fleet of 18 working aircraft.
Stealth22 is offline   Reply With Quote