[Lanny_McDonald]

Originally Posted by Illuminaughty

Gender wage gap is a persisting myth that won't go away. For example if we were both carpenters making $30 an hour, say I worked 60 hours a week and you worked 40 hours a week, who earns more? Obviously me because I worked more hours and it only seems fair that I should earn more. Learn the difference between wages and earnings. Men work more that's why they earn more, it's pretty simple really. Again, if you could pay a woman less money to do the same job as a man, there would be many civil discrimination suits, and rightfully so. This isn't the case, no economist takes this seriously, it's just a politically motivated myth that won't die.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/karinagn.../#4b9ad7764766

That link should paint a much clearer picture for you, it even deals with the links you posted.

That link doesn't say what you think it says. It references two groups who prove the existence of the gender wage gap, including a White House site which is covered by the non-partisan OMB for accuracy in numbers and information published. In fact, there is nothing in that link that counters or provides support to the claim that the wage gap is fallacious, other than the word of the author. The author, the founder and president of a conservative activist group who is active in an anti-feminist movement, who Forbes magazine just happens to endorse. This link shows how little people will dig into their references to understand their bias and political motivation. What's next? Using a link from RT (Putin's new Pravda)?

So why did the FBI re-open the investigation? I know just to get the masses to vote for Trump, which has already been alleged by some posters here.

The investigation was never closed nor re-opened. These emails were from a source that was not privy to the original investigation, nor available through the original subpoena. This was so much BS, and such a transgression against the law, the role of the FBI and the DOJ, and the spirit of the constitution that is is amazing that anyone on the right thinks this was remotely close to being legal. If this had been any other person but Clinton, there would have been a holy war for this action. If it had been someone like Ryan or Cruz there would have been blood in the street. It is that inconsistency and double standard that makes this who issue so had to stomach. Where was this outrage when the Bush administration deleted 330 million emails on a private server housed at the RNC? It didn't exist because it was a non-issue.

Almost all of Clinton's inner circle - the cast of advisers known as Clintonworld - and many of their family are caught up in an FBI dragnet.
The scale of investigations under way is unprecedented in electoral history.
There are five separate investigations:
The handling of classified information on the Clinton email server
Whether the Foundation was used to peddle influence
Whether illegal Chinese donations were taken by a Clinton intimate
Whether John Podesta's brother acted as a front for illegal lobbying
Anthony Weiner's sexting relationship with a 15-year-old.
Now we have what's being referred to as "PizzaGate".

Pizzagate. Right off of reddit, the rectum of the internet and the center of activity for the alt-right. Get off of Fantasy Island and get into the real world. When you do we can likely have a real discussion on issues. Until then it is very hard to take seriously anyone who used reddit as their primary source of information.

I don't think you get the extent to how deep her corruption and those in her inner circle really goes. This is a little more then just plausible deniability and being careless with emails or trusting the wrong third party officials like you are trying to point out. There is clear intent here, whether or not these people get punished I guess we will see. How many times can she be accused of being a criminal before the apologists will take an actual look at it. Scandal follows her everywhere she goes, and it's pretty obvious why.

So you should be able to post lots of links from reputable sources of information to back up yur claims of corruption. I'm not talking about your asinine reddit, Breitbart, Alex Jones/Infowars/Above Top Secret garbage. I'm talking about sites that do real journalism and can provide actual sources of information. See, someone can claim you're a pedophile and you get your rocks off on six year boys, but that doesn't make it accurate or true. Unless there is some actual evidence to support the claim, it is garbage.

You can just google Hillary Clinton email scandal and go from there. I could post some links but you would just dismiss it because that's not where you get your news from.

Except I don't get my information from news in this regard. I worked in the US government for over a decade in a capacity that deals with this exact scenario. I know how this works, including working with the FBI in nailing people for misuse of privileged government information. You can post all the bull#### links you want from reedit and RW alt-right sites that you want, but the reality is that they are full of flaws, which I will just have to rip apart, just like I did with gozer's garbage. There are laws on the books that identify how this stuff works, and all the humming and hawing on reddit doesn't change those laws, nor how the DOJ or FBI have to prove intent and fault.

I missed that post, to be fair it likely got lost in the shuffle of hurling garbage insults at Trump and Shillary apologetics. Yay I got an actual challenger. Let's dance.

Of course you did.

Yes, it was all lost in Trump insults and Hillary apologetics. The original post was clearly that. No, you ran in the other direction, because that is what you do. You say let's dance, well get out on the dance floor already. Stop your telling everyone you're Fred Astaire, show us your moves tough guy. The ball is clearly in your court.