Quote:
Originally posted by RougeUnderoos+Nov 3 2004, 10:37 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (RougeUnderoos @ Nov 3 2004, 10:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-MrMastodonFarm@Nov 3 2004, 11:10 PM
I have got to hand it to AlbertGQ, he has no credible arguments, he has no legs left to stand on, and he stopped making sense a long time ago, but yet he is still going. I think even Jordon in is heyday would have stopped long ago.
|
Not so fast -- his side does deserve some credit. They've turned the issue of consenting, rational, normal adults marrying each other into a theoretical argument a possible Man/Feline wedding ceremony. That's pretty slick.
In other news, some people think that certain large breeds of dogs should be banned but I think that would lead to extremely high gas prices. I mean if you won't allow certain breeds of dogs, what next? [/b][/quote]
Just because you feel my example is not related to yours does not mean it isn't.
BOTH cases involve two consenting human beings of legal age
BOTH cases does not affect anyone else
BOTH cases does not result in deformed babies
Gay example involves non related people where the incest one does
Similarities??? Yes
Differences??? Sure
Although the two scenarios are not identical, they are comparable