Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzzy McGillicuddy
On the surface, the owner who gave up Morris for Betts would appear to be a fantasy football buffoon. But you shouldn't be vetoing trades unless there is a hint of collusion between owners. Who's to say how some owners value players. If the commish or other owners start vetoing trades, it stifles rather than encourages competition.
|
I absolutely agree.
In another thread I laid out what happened in one of my pools. (Long story short - Commish said it wasn't fair and vetoed it. I kicked up a fuss and had it re-instated). I traded a defensive player for a WR. Since the trade that was so slanted, C. Henry hasn't played a snap due to one game team disciplinary action, a bye, and currently a 2 game NFL suspension. He also has a DUI hearing on Nov 27 and may be suspended for 4 more weeks. So much for the "unfair" trade.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|