Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarkey
I don't want to be a Debbie Downer but I feel this social media blitz is unwarranted for the relatively minimal non-warranty damage that occurred. It sucks but you are SOL by the letter of the law. To maintain PR, most other bottom line focused companies would have caved after the social media campaign, but I don't think you are entitled to it by any means. As a homeowner stuff breaks down and that's on you to fix it (or pay someone else to). It sucks but such is life, I had to throw a flat screen in the dumpster a few years back because it pooched itself a couple months past the warranty. I could have probably squawked and got a replacement but the warranty was up so fair's fair.
|
I disagree. The "technology" exists to secure a sink until Trump nukes it to bits. It's no more costly to install it properly than to botch it. If you knew some dolt ponk'd your tv while building it, you be mad too. If you were correct, where would you draw the the line? Should your house collapse into dust on day 366? Houses and their components are held to a much higher standard than tv's. Why build a sink out of stainless steal if it's just going to fall apart in a year?