Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Well, I can't force you off your hedge.
Personally though, I think only an idiot would consider this a "substantive change". Which, of course, is why the NDP government essentially sued themselves over it. I suspect they are only considering trying to change the contracts via legislation now because they don't expect their lawsuit to go anywhere. And, much like their repeatedly unconstitutional attempts to pass a differential beer taxation scheme, I doubt this will succeed either.
|
In his defence he's a lawyer so he's not going to give an opinion on a complex legal issue on the internet (or he shouldn't). That's how you get a call from the law society.