Quote:
Originally Posted by belsarius
In good faith to who? Because the "unprofitable or less profitable" clause was not done in good faith. It was added without the public consultation like the other clauses. It wasn't included in normally public access to the agreements and hidden to the point where you needed to find the original documents in the archives to actually find it. What good faith do you mean?
|
It's not bad faith because Notley's government failed to read the contracts before making changes that gave the companies the right to exit. Doesn't matter how many times you repeat it to yourself.