Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
You've presumed that "being a part of the solution" is agreeing with you on how to solve the problem. You can't say, "if you agree with me on the goal we're after, then in order to be a part of the solution, you have to accept that I'm right that this is how we fix things". That's not a reasonable request. If we're driving to Banff and I see you start heading East, I'm going to try to get you to turn the car around.
|
Actually, "being part of the solution" means talking to people and treating people in the same way YOU say they should talk to each other to reach that solution, it has nothing to do with me. It's about not stepping off the path YOU'VE outlined the moment it someone else does. It's hard, but imagine how hard it is for people to keep to the path you think is right in the face of racism and homophobia when some people can't even stay on it at the first perception of
emotion.
We don't need to agree. You keep saying we have the same goals and honestly I don't think we do.
That's ok with me.
I honestly think criticism of the RL usually ends up visibly indifferent than the same things they get criticised for. Broad strokes, breakdown of conversation, demanding. When you spend more time focusing on the disagreeable methods of people with supposedly shared goals than you do on people with opposing goals, you gain nothing.
What do I know though, I'm clearly just an emotional wreck.
Dismiss as you please
