Quote:
Originally Posted by tkflames
It's actually fairly straightforward:
PP top 16 for the last 50-60 games
PK top 16 for the last 50-60 games
PT% top 16 for the last 50- 60 games
GA avg top 16 for the last 50-60 games
Development of young players is a bit of an intangible from a measurement standpoint.
These are the parameters of improvement that BT set out at the end of last season. For a salary cap team, the above parameters would likely put us in the 18-25th overall position based on how the next few games go (I. E. No progression from last year despite an extra year of experience). I believe we can both agree that anything less would be a complete failure.
For the sake of argument between you and I, 22-30 games is well beyond anything that should ever be necessary to learn a new system/coach based on those parameters previously presented.
|
I think your parameters are generally fair and likely represent the actual metrics that have been set out for the team by team management. As to what "should ever be necessary to learn a new system/coach" I will not comment except to say I do not know. Having never played professional hockey and all, it is difficult for me to say what should or should not happen in the event of a pretty dramatic coaching change.