Several posters in different threads said, that GG is good tactician, analyst and bright hockey mind. Where this reputation comes from? It's not like he invented some brilliant ways to use our players, or has shown anything particularly bright and clever. It almost seems as people want to lambast GG for lack of commanding presence, but they feel the need to appear "fair" and "objective" so they mention that he is smart tactician, although there seems to be no evidence behind it.
|