Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
You're comparing unjustified opposition to a scientific position, which is developed based on a scientific process, to a sociological diagnosis? Come on, man. This is politics. It's human interaction. There's a huge difference between these things, and you do not have all the right answers when it comes to culture, society, and morality. There's an argument that there are no right answers - I reject that argument, personally, but the fact that it's even defensible should tell you something about the landscape we're dealing with here.
And again, you're doing the same thing repeatedly. You might as well have compared my lack of certainty about the relative importance of various causes leading to disproportionate violent encounters between police and black people to a lack of certainty about whether the Earth is flat. Leaving aside your own erroneous level of certainty and Mill's warning about dead dogmas... do you not get how insulting, how condescending that is? Again, why would anyone who doesn't already agree with you want to talk to you about this stuff, given the way you talk about it?
|
Man you're predictable. Go after the example instead of the point. Do you agree or disagree that you're predisposed to some form of bias and characterization of your opponent in nearly every debate? Hell, I watch you and Cliff engage in it nearly every time a discussion about PC culture or the regressive left comes up.