Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
I'm starting to come around to this Clinton being the wrong candidate because she's so disliked. To me so much emphasis on it is just as silly as debates being a major criteria for choosing a president (or anything for that matter, debates are the worst venue for anything), I want to choose a candidate based on competency, policy, history, as well as communication skills.
But I'm far from a typical voter, and I understand that right or wrong it's the way the world works.
But I don't see how fighting populism with populism (by putting forward a populist liberal) in a country where the divide between the left right continues to widen is a good solution. Already the difference between left and right is less "my ideas differ from theirs" and more "if you're one of them you can't be one of us".
Being part of the rise of nationalistic xenophobic populism around the world doesn't seem like a good path forward.
|
Here's one for you photon,
Romney was the 'out of touch billionaire candidate'
Trump is richer than Romney! How did he become the 'in touch everyman candidate'? Books will be written on this.