Quote:
Originally Posted by Drak
Did you see the where I said a mirage of one? Did I say the Clinton's held a higher family values ground? I think that is where you are missing the point. You are having a conversation on points I wasn't making. You immediately jumped to "But Bill Clinton!"
|
Mirage of a of a family value marriage?
In what desert does anyone think that?
If multiple affairs is okay to maintain a marriage acceptable in terms of the 'family values moral high ground' clause required to be president, then so would multiple divorces, as long as both are in functional marriages now, neither really has a leg up on the other. And spouses absolutely play a part in the family values issue that you want to bring up, so you can't say that this has nothing to do with Bill. It's asinine that you think you can bring up the presidential candidates families and not have Bill discussed. (EDIT: And of course I don't think a president needs to be happily married or anything like that, but those that do, an affair or a divorce probably have similar weight).
Michelle is a huge reason why the Obamas are looked up so favourably when it comes to "family values" as she should be.
Either way, I still think you need to change your attitude towards potential rape-victims.