Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
Here's your line PepsiFree:
So when the Raditas chose not to put insulin into their son's body, should you not be supporting that decision? Do you change your opinion that the government should have control over what we put into our bodies under certain conditions then?
At least we can start trying to define your line if that's the case.
|
I still support the claim, 100%. It's the basis of my entire argument. Does that mean that exceptions for just cause make me a hypocrite? If it does, so be it, but that's how the world works. Nothing is completely black and white.
I also think parents have the duty to protect their child from certain death, and that they should rightfully be tried for murder should their child contract a deadly disease which they refuse to treat them for.
The risk of dying because you weren't given routine vaccinations is still incredibly low. The risk of dying from a deadly disease because you weren't given treatment is 100%.
Your solution to the problem of "idiots" is taking away the rights of everyone and giving the government full control to drug and vaccinate the population. My solution is simply educating people.
You need to answer the abortion question, or sterilisation, or whatever. Why? Because you've brought up multiple bizarre hypotheticals revolving around injecting kids with heroin and refusing a sick child treatment for a deadly disease. If you truly equate these things to the belief that the government should not be able to mandate any injection to 100% of the population, then you should at least be able to see the connections we're making.
Don't ask the types questions you're afraid to answer yourself.