Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesla
Nope.. it is a mistake plain and simple...
Not enough manpower or intelligence going into the mission... and not looking closely enough at History....
Fact is... logic denotes that it is in the united states best interest that Iraq and afghanistan are stable. Stable footholds in Iraq and Afghanistan would mean they are surrounding Iran..... strategic foothold as well as proving the world that the US is king-**** and finally capable of perhaps stabilizing the middle east region.
However, it has not gone as planned...
Instead of looking up unfolding conspiricies and trying to find layers of deception.. think logically about this...
|
Fact is that the United States has ****ed up Iraq and Afghanistan so badly that no one trusts them to do anything right at the moment. Both countries are devolving into lawless terrorism generators. Things could not be much worse than that.
I haven't looked at the links, but I don't know what you mean by conspiracy theories? Fact of the matter is that the neo-conservatives have been hell bent on getting into Iraq since 1998. That is well documented. Also, Bush had the battle plans for Iraq on his desk less than 48 hours after the twin towers had fallen. Seems pretty pre-meditated to me. Sadly, Bush and Co. ignored the generals and went charging in, believing their own false bravado, and making a bigger mess of Iraq than when Hussein was in power. There is no argument, Iraq is a much worse place than it was prior to the invasion, Iraq is a more dangerous country, and Iraq is now the primary fuel for terrorists. What a colossal **** up!!!