Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
there's not much that he can challenge if the election is an overwhelming slaughter. I guess he could challenge at a federal court level, but where's the proof of voter fraud or intimidation that he can take to and prove in court, and is he going to spend the millions to put up that challenge? I doubt it, he's probably looking at the monetary and human costs now.
|
Maybe is goal now is to produce an overwhelming slaughter.
I mean there is no way the democrats could win Texas and Georgia without rigging the election. How could they win the house when the demographics in the district are set up against them. Its impossible in a two party system for one to have 60% support. The bigger the defeat and the more historicly significant the defeat the more the fix is in.
Conservtive newspapers endorse Hillary -- She obviously did something as previously they had always endorsed GOP.
He can go on and on. For this to work he needs to lose big and in areas the GOP hasn't lost before. Losing the house might be even better because it takes off any checks and balances and all of the 2018 cycle can be how the Dems did nothing with their blank check.
Trump is the Bond villain now from Tomorrow never dies