Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
It was a question because we are talking about the $15 and no matter what value you used, you were wrong. But way to be an #######...and your point is still wrong. 11.20*52*40=$23,296...still below the poverty line.
Obviously that meant minimum, and full-time has no actual definition. Full-time employment could mean 32 hours and no one would bat an eye at that. To say that full-time employment at minimum wage was over the poverty line was fundamentally wrong.
|
Actually since full time has no definition then we can use 44 hours a week and no one will bat an eyelash. Bingo. Full time employment at the old minimum wage gets you over...well over... the "poverty line" for urban areas. You could live like a king in Oyen. Again, sorry for freaking you out.